I was not the one who wrote this, you did:
the sworn testimony of the Antrim County clerk (Republican) Sheryl Guy that the problem was human error in failing to update the reporting server with the proper election reporting software.
Even I am subject to human error in repeating what the press reported as a software update and the clerk testified was a ballot update (data)
The later post above was correct.
RE: Even I am subject to human error in repeating what the press reported as a software update and the clerk testified was a ballot update (data)
Yes. This was reported by the press. See here for example:
“The issue with Antrim County’s presidential results occurred after county Clerk Sheryl Guy failed to update Election Source software on all tabulators after performing an update to two of them,” the Detroit News reported. “The failure caused the machines to transpose results as they were sent to the county’s main software.”
See also here:
OK, I’ll give you a pass on this one, but the other question has not been answered... if Dominion is really a well designed system and above board, with nothing suspicious in its design, and of the problematic counties do not have problems, I think they should welcome forensic audits of their machines WHERE TRUMP LOST SUSPICIOUSLY if only to clear their company name of anything sinister.
Instead, we get news like this:
Title: Legal battle begins after Maricopa County REFUSES to conduct forensic audit of Dominion voting machines ordered by Arizona senate
https://www.rt.com/usa/510193-arizona-gop-maricopa-subpoena-audit/
and then we have delays in the discovery process extending till April 2021. See last sentence here:
In the meantime, while they have possession of the machines, who knows what kind of monkey business they are doing with it...