Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Persevero
I don’t think that we want tyranny. We are seeing two options: one man rule or a communist coup. Not a choice we wanted but it seems to have been foisted on

Please explain how one male rule is not tyranny.

191 posted on 12/19/2020 10:33:54 AM PST by Fury (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: Fury

What a day!

“one male” should be “one man” Geesh!


194 posted on 12/19/2020 10:35:54 AM PST by Fury (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

To: Fury

Tyranny would be an unwanted/unelected man ruling by force.

Trump staying in office until a fair election can be run would be the wanted, elected man staying in power.

I don’t think anyone here is advocating “forever.” Until the next presidential election is fine by me. He won this one and should serve. In the meantime we can rout the communist collaborators and put in better election safeguards.


196 posted on 12/19/2020 10:36:54 AM PST by Persevero (I am afraid propriety has been set at naught. - Jane Austen to )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

To: Fury

Martial law by its very definition is tyranny on some level. That’s a given. And why you don’t want to run with it until all else fails.


260 posted on 12/19/2020 12:51:58 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson