Woohoo!
So this is sufficient to win Wisconsin, provided they can make the determinations and do it fairly.
How will they know how these fake indefinitely confined voted? Is there a record? Also- anyone know how many votes is the gap?
There was a 20,000 vote difference. SO at the very least, you have to find 20,000 absentee voters who you can PROVE did not meet the criteria for being confined, or reasonably expecting to be confined, on the day of the election.
The easiest would be to track down every absentee voter, and ask them to sign an affidavit indicating they only did absentee because the state said they could because of COVID, and they had no other reason to vote absentee.
Unlikely you have enough people to run around and collect 20,000 of those, although I imagine with enough time, you could get 20,000 people to agree to that. Maybe you get republicans to do it, because they might be more willing to help.
There is no way you are going to investigate 20,000 people, and go to court, and prove they didn’t meet the criteria. And if you DID, it might not be enough, as the law essentially says the VOTER decides if they are confined, so you’d have to prove they were NOT confined, and that they did not consider themselves confined.
And if you managed to find 20,000, or even 40,000, you then have to convince a judge that the number of invalid votes is so much bigger than the resulting difference in votes, that you can no longer be sure which candidate really won.
And then convince them to invalidate the certification. At which point you have to get the legislature to appoint electors, except the electors already voted. So now you have competing slates.
Since there is no way the house is going to accept republican electors, you’d have to hope the senate would (meaning you have to win Georgia first), and then wait for a court to rule on an age-old question, which slate is accepted if the house and senate disagree; or are the electors discarded.
Discarding the electors does almost no good. You’d have to discard electors from 7 states to get Trump ahead. swapping electors in Wisconsin also doesn’t get you the election, you need 3 other states to tie it.
And this all has to happen within 3 weeks. Over christmass.
The time for this court case was the day after the state issued the guidance. My guess is any court will look at this and say “you waited until after the election to see if you got advantage from it, we aren’t throwing out already determined results based on real votes from people who THOUGHT they were voting, just because the state screwed up”.