Maybe, but probably not.
What the SCOTUS essentially said was that if a state wanted to certify a fraudulent election, they’re good with that because it is up to the state to decide how they select their electors.
But then there are two executive orders that President Trump signed regarding foreign interference in US election - and Dominion is a foreign owned and controlled corporation. Problem is, if President Trump tries to act on that, who will support him? Is he going to implement martial law and start kicking down doors?
All We The People can do right now is wait and see. Have a feeling we’re about to go into uncharted territory.
Oh how I hate having to wait. It’s a lot worse than sitting in a doctor’s waiting room for an hour until the doctor finally sees you. Know what I mean?
There is going to be a severe shortage of door kickers should that occur.
In fact, it is much more probable that such an order would lead to Trump being deposed, by violence if Congress did not act first.
“...SCOTUS essentially said was that if a state wanted to certify a fraudulent election, they’re good with that because it is up to the state to decide how they select their electors.”
Agreed.
Now, if a group of conservatives or Republicans had done the exact same, all of the courts, the DOJ, FBI, local police, etc, (state and federal), at every level, would be treating us with near extreme prejudice, life sentences, houses burned, and family members assaulted.
Case in point — Roberts unlawfully taking it upon himself to rewrite the “Affordable Care Act”, to make it “legal”.
In the recent Texas case, if it were the conservative Republicans who had committed massive election fraud, and it were the Republicans who had already declared they were going to rip down the border wall and floor Texas with illegals, SCOTUS would have likely expanded their reasoning, to recognize the people of Texas (being represented by their AG), did indeed have “standing”, as they were going to be irrevocably damaged, with great financial and electoral harm. Then SCOTUS would have also recognized the Democrat president who had “ajoined” the Texas case with his own “Petition”, also had “standing”, as it would have been the Democrat president and his likely super majority of voters who wwee fraudulently beaten, and votes feloniously stolen.