Errors like this will be what allows the media to say that the entire report has been “debunked” and then never report anything else. Even if the error rate is 6.805% instead of the reported 68.05%, it is still way beyond what is acceptable but such errors would destroy the effectiveness of the report. I hope there are no further math errors.
One cannot actually READ the report and conclude it is debunkable [SIC]. To understand the report, is to clearly see there was irrefutable, deliberate FRAUD.