Posted on 12/13/2020 9:15:19 AM PST by Hostage
Maybe, just maybe we can get Biden Electors to vote for Trump.
It’s difficult but not impossible.
The executive order 13848 requiring the Director of National Intelligence to submit a report on all election interference from a foreign government.
True, but neither do we want a clearly FRAUDULENT administration. We already suffered through a FRAUDULENT FOREIGN USURPER with 0'Bama.
I will only comment on your A) because the rest is ‘nonsensical’.
The Electors, in this case a slate of GA Electors, were not selected. The GA Electors selected were for Biden. Their vote for Biden, sealed or unsealed is irrelevant. The GA Electors for Trump were eliminated by CRIMINAL FRAUD.
All of the above matters conditionally on how the Court reacts.
December 18th is D-Day, we are at the Rubicon.
It's not even remotely the first generally recognized election theft for office of President.
The last known theft occurred in 2008 and 2012 when an ineligible person not a 'natural born citizen' took the office.
Before that, when Kennedy beat Nixon there was shady voting going on in Illinois (Chicago) and Texas (Dallas) that gave Kennedy the win.
And if you ask the Democrats, they will swear that Dubya and SCOTUS stole the 2000 election.
If we're making predictions then based on the fate of her cases so far I'd say probably not.
Some of the “technical” responses around here are a lot like the Captain of the Titanic reading through the ship’s operations manual and announcing to the crew:
“There is nothing about icebergs in the manual. Back to work..nothing to see here!”
The new rules under the SCOTUS:
1. Individuals lack standing to bring election fraud cases to the SCOTUS because they haven’t had an evidentiary hearing in a lower court.
2. Lower courts can arbitrarily dismiss any case and do not need to allow evidentiary hearings of evidence if they don’t like the people who are bringing the evidence.
3. States lack standing to bring election fraud cases because they aren’t real people and can’t experience a “tort”.
4. States which do not follow their own election laws and violate the Federal Constitution in such a way as to steal an election can not be disenfranchised but states that do, can be.
5. These new rules are based on the principles of law laid down by the legal scholar in “Treasure of the Sierra Madre” who stated, “We don’t need no stinkin’ badges!”
The date chosen is statutory, not constitutional.
The Court may disregard the statutory date set for tomorrow and proceed with this emergency.
The Electoral College is now on notice that whatever business they conduct between now and January 20, 2021 can be set aside.
Whether the Court acts on this or not, the events of December 18, 2020 will start.
This is the first stolen election conducted by foreign powers.
Makes all the difference.
All part of the plan for nancy pelosi’s succession to the Presidency. Biden will be seated and then will resign shortly after because the “now” release of the investigation of Hunter Biden will fall back on Joe, and he will step down “for the good of the country”. Kamala Harris will assume the office until Nancy brings her down with the mountain of BS evidence she has against her (stronger than what she had against trump), and then she will be seated at this “reigning 46th President”. Tom Clancy could not have written a better novel! The first year of her “reign” will be to jail all of the Trump family, including the President, and then the Conservatives that voted for him. I pray that it stays a “Tom Clancy Novel”.
The authority to set the date chosen is constitutional. Just as the constitution says that Electors are to be selected an the manner that the state legislatures determine (not by a court,) the U.S. Constitution says that the date the Electors meet is to be set by the U.S. Legislature, not by the courts.
I have never heard of any such 'secret force'. What's your source?
“A) No, because the votes are secret, they are sealed until January 6, Electors therefore do not know that “their candidate” is defeated.”
Why does an elector have to know which candidate won in order to sue? If federal laws were broken in such a way that they gave advantage to the set of Electors that favored one candidate over another that should be sufficient reason to justify the suit. Otherwise you would then have to sue after the Electors vote which is then too late.
(Parties choose their slate of Electors and they obviously choose them because they are committed to vote for the party’s candidate)
And doesn’t any Trump voter have standing to bring suit?
And why isn’t simply the breaking of a law not sufficient cause for a suit, whether actual damage has yet occurred or not?
If a cop catches me speeding he’ll give me a ticket whether I caused an accident or not.
Good point!
In fact, Senate had voted to accept Hawaii’s final electoral vote count at last minute in 1961.
1960: Hawaii Sends Two Slates to Electoral College
Patriots, please bear in mind that electoral vote madness is based entirely on desperate Democrats and RINOs fighting tooth and nail to retain control of state powers that unconstitutionally big federal government has stolen, and is continuing to steal, from states.
Can someone please explain what this filing by Sidney Powell means and what court is it filed in?
Jim Noble
* * * * *
You seem to know a lot about the law. Were you ever a Federal Judge? Not to be rude, but you seem to know what they think. Or at least you think you know how they think.
thank you
bttt
I do agree with your overall point. This is Sidney throwing something at the wall to see if it sticks. It won't. They might as well continue to do this a little awhile longer to expose what we know about the law not being following in various states and any corrupt or fraudulent acts.
That said, the ONLY thing that matters now is Purdue (R) vs Ossoff (D) & Loeffler (R) vs Warnock (D) in Georgia.
Can we trust this director of national intelligence?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.