Well, in my opinion from what you posted, it’s pretty cut and dry. Case closed. Drop box ballots illegal ballots.
ya, not sure if i was watching the end or i got delayed and was watching some time before the end. (someone else here might be able to fill in.)
I only saw the last part of the hearing but from what I saw, it was fairly typical of other issues before them. This court has been a very divided and contentious body for some time. The minority has never gotten over not being the majority and they reflected their extreme bias today. For a justice to engage in the impassioned rant about this being the most historical election of our time and how it is so terrible for anyone to suggest that any person from Wisconsin would commit fraud is itself bordering on juridical misconduct. For another to be so disrespectful as to state that the President of the United States considered himself to be a king is a pretty good indicator of their lack of judicial temperament.
Yes, this isn’t complicated:
Ballot drop boxes = illegal
Democracy in the Park events = illegal
Clerk correcting ballots = illegal
We don’t (shouldn’t) need witnesses. In a sane world, all we (should) need are a few objective, indisputable pieces of info:
1) copy of statute
2) copy of extra-legislative document directing localities to deviate from statute
3) numbers of ballots associated with illegal drop boxes, illegal voter registration events, and illegally corrections
I’ve been saying this from the start: no malicious intent or accusations of fraud are necessary. THE LAW WAS BROKEN. REPEATEDLY. No need whatsoever to argue anything beyond this fact.