Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeReign
It's not a slogan, the first thing Justices look at are Constitutional questions, not evidence.

Since each State is autonomous is forming election laws, each State can tell the other States to piss off regarding their procedures. Please explain that Constitutional protection the States posses. Do they not have rights in relation to their own laws? Even in Federal elections Article II grants them this right.

There might have been some semblance of combining arguments via other cases into one but that never formulated due to the piling on perhaps.

In any case, there are other avenues the Court might grant cert. Don't get your hopes up though.

1,577 posted on 12/11/2020 8:16:39 PM PST by rollo tomasi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1379 | View Replies ]


To: rollo tomasi; FreeReign
Since each State is autonomous is forming election laws, each State can tell the other States to piss off regarding their procedures.

More importantly, this is further evidence that states can apparently tell the Federal government to piss off in how it choses to enact, or not enact, Federal law adequately or correctly.

I believe the last original jurisdiction case was when a state like Nebraska tried to sue Colorado for not following federal laws with regard to dope smoking, and that state lost.

Expect a lot more states to start taking advantage of that apparent freedom, both in good ways and bad.

1,588 posted on 12/11/2020 8:25:30 PM PST by Golden Eagle (********** MERRY CHRISTMAS ***********)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1577 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson