Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BillyBoy

No originalist would vote to hear any of these cases.

There are no Federal constitutional issues involved in these cases.


1,373 posted on 12/11/2020 6:18:14 PM PST by Jim Noble (Lo there do I see the line of my people, back to the beginning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1369 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble

No originalist would vote to hear any of these cases.

There are no Federal constitutional issues involved in these cases.

*********
They can pat themselves on the back when Biden packs the court and makes them irrelevant for another 80 years.


1,456 posted on 12/11/2020 6:50:37 PM PST by Finalapproach29er (luke 6:38 )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1373 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Noble
No originalist would vote to hear any of these cases.

There are no Federal constitutional issues involved in these cases.

Jim,

How can you say such a statement when a State versus a State is specifically cited in the Constitution as being in the Original Jurisdiction of the SC.? Hearing the case the court may dismiss it but refusing to hear it is infantile and failure in its role.

1,478 posted on 12/11/2020 7:05:59 PM PST by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1373 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson