Posted on 12/09/2020 3:53:45 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
That's not what your Attorney General is saying.
But a majority apparently did.
I have a feeling he’ll run for governor.
LOL
Our Attorney General speaks with forked tongue
But, he sees Ducey lawyering up and....
What? How can one of the perpetrators of election “irregularities” become one of the plaintiff associates/amicus?
Yes!!!
Kabuki dance. Amicus is wimpy and could theoretically argue against Texas suit.
Thanks for your effort on this critical issue.
Please put me on a ping list if you have one for your posts/replies/ on the most critical issue in my 82 years.
Updated list: Texas, Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia, and Arizona.
19 of 50 States. We need one more to reach 40% threshold (sounds much better than 36%!)
Where is Alaska? Everyone please mail and request the Alaska AG join the FIGHT!!!
“It wasn’t 100% for Biden.”
“But a majority apparently did.”
They were all disenfranchised.
Biden voters might not care but that doesn’t matter.
Joining despite his state ostensibly voted majority Biden shows integrity and commitment to the proper execution of a national election and rule of law.
If we can get AK, ID, WY, NC, KY, IA and OH, we’ve got a majority of states and the makings of a new country.
Ohio AG is investigating and considering! I sent an email to Alaska AG asst. Need to wake up the other states.
Pinging the KS ping list. IF ANYONE WANTS OFF THE KS LIST PM ME!
Here you go Colonel: Some additional support from a middle border state!
TOPEKA – (December 9, 2020) – Kansas and 16 other states are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a lawsuit brought by Texas and review whether voting procedures in several states that are alleged to have departed from state statutory requirements also violated the U.S. Constitution, Attorney General Derek Schmidt said today.
“A month ago, Kansas asked the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court violated the U.S. Constitution by disregarding the plain requirements of that state’s statutory deadline governing mail-in ballots,” Schmidt said. “Our request remains pending at the high court, and the Texas filing yesterday presents to the Court the same important legal question.”
Principally at issue is whether the U.S. Constitution’s express requirement that “the Legislature” in each state set various election requirements means that other state officials, such as state courts, are federally required to follow state election statutes the Legislature has enacted and lack legal authority to order departures from statutory requirements.
In a motion filed yesterday, Texas asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear its federal constitutional challenge to election procedures in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Georgia that Texas says differed from the requirements of those states’ statutes. Kansas today joined with Missouri and 15 other states in filing an amicus brief that asks the high court to grant the Texas motion, hear the case and decide the question.
“These are important and potentially recurring constitutional questions that need an answer to guide states,” Schmidt said. “Kansas ran its elections honestly and by the rules that are supposed to apply evenly to all of us. Texas asserts it can prove four states violated the U.S. Constitution in an election that affects all Americans, so Texas should be heard. Everyone would benefit from clarity about what the U.S. Constitution requires of states as they administer federal elections. Since yesterday, we have been working closely with Missouri to determine the best legal arguments to present to the Court, and those arguments are advanced in this brief.”
A copy of the brief Kansas joined in support of the U.S. Supreme Court hearing the Texas lawsuit is available https://bit.ly/3qKvRWS.
It would be a good thing to keep making noise, to get in touch with your Reps and our Senators and let them know that we are very aware of the fraud that took place in the swing states, that the MSM is trying to hide what happened with their “No evidence debunked” lying to us. That people are really really upset and angry about it. We also know that we are in the majority and are tired of election fraud. Ask them to openly support the efforts to overturn this fraud and if it comes to a contested election in the Congress in January to support Trump and Pence.
https://www.house.gov/
https://www.senate.gov/
Thanks!
Yup
The AG is apparently against what the AZ Gov has done. The AG is no fool.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.