[tarpit]

Not all legal pundits agree with this case. It is interesting to read their opinions and compare, somewhat like being on a jury. For example, Steve Vladeck, professor of Law at University of Texas School of Law, is not a fan as described in his Hot Take 17 states and Trump join Texas' lawsuit. It's still a doomed Supreme Court stunt opinion piece.

It is educational to read viewpoints from both sides.

[hawkaw]

Thank you for that article. Yes. That is a very good point. Also, I was trying to make the point that legal pundits, like Steve Vladeck, made - they are not optimistic in the success of the case at all for the reasons provided by Steve. I also like Steve’s comments about how all this hurts the independence of the Court and all for political advancement.