Well stated. I agree.
SCOTUS would not have even put any such motion, or complaint, on the docket...much less ruled on it.
Prior to the election, any such complaints about fraud wouldn't even be "ripe" within a state's judicial system as the election would not have taken place yet.
The best bet, prior to the election, would have been for plaintiff's within the state (Attorney General's for example) to argue before their state courts/supreme courts, that their respective states legislatures jurisdiction/power to make state election laws were being violated by their Secretaries of State.
Unfortunately, we've gotten an idea on how some of those states judiciaries would rule.
It's really quite the cluster F$#* our country has allowed to fester.
Well YOU would....heck it’s raining wherever you land on the threads!