[rxsid]

"My question was if the evidence about fraud could be submitted."

The President's lawyer points out it isn't necessary to prove, therefore, not necessary to submit.

Violations of Article II have already been proven by the defendant states' SOS/Judiciary known/stated actions.

SCOTUS isn't going to hear a case like this based on fraud. However...they have full, original jurisdiction to hear Article II violations that cause a dispute between states.

Question remains, will they have the guts to taken on this nuclear hot potato, federal government altering issue!?!? We shall see, probably by the end of this week.

[tarpit]

I really did not appreciate who is representing Trump until you pointed that out. Thank you.

[CottonBall]

“The President’s lawyer points out it isn’t necessary to prove, therefore, not necessary to submit.”

Right, this case is only about how entities other than the state legislatures made election decisions.

I think the cases about fraud need to continue no matter what, or the fraud will continue. It needs to be proven, Dominion machines shown to be unsecure, the real vote of the election proven.

Unfortunately, Texas’ case might solve the election outcome, but it distracts from what really happened. Dems need to be shown for who they really are. Or they will give Trump even worse than they did the last 4 years. And will continue to steal elections.

[Fawn]

Question remains, will they have the guts to taken on this nuclear hot potato, federal government altering issue!?!? We shall see, probably by the end of this week.

So they can pass on this horrible country dividing almost hostile takeover becuz they are scared?