Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Theoretically, best choice would be an order to revote the 4 states, this time according to law.

But SCOTUS may throw it back to the state legislatures to decide who the proper electors are. Since that is the remedy in the Constitution for a failed election.

OR, ....they may simply strongly recommend serious electoral reforms for the future, and hand it to Biden along with a scolding of Democrat election officials.


241 posted on 12/09/2020 8:16:30 AM PST by cookcounty (Susan Rice: G Gordon Liddy times 10.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cookcounty

Another poster said that SCOTUS could simply say that the results of the elections in those states were invalid. Neither candidate would have 270 since the slates of electors from those states would be in dispute.

Constitution kicks in at that point, and the matter goes to the House.

Each STATE, represents 1 vote. If the state has more R Reps than D, then it’s an R vote. Vice versa. Currently, there are 26 R delegations, and 23 Ds (and 1 I, which could not caucus with the Ds). DJT remains POTUS.


242 posted on 12/09/2020 8:20:21 AM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson