Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
"Response to the motion...requested...."

Texas is requesting a response from SCOTUS by Dec 10? Or from the 4 named states?


160 posted on 12/08/2020 8:57:21 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

TX, FL and other red states. Are making a clear proclamation that they consider Biden to be illigetimate.


161 posted on 12/08/2020 9:09:50 PM PST by cowboyusa (America Cowboy up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

The timeline for response to lawsuits is generally by standing rule - get sued, have 21 days to answer sort of thing.

This is an interesting case because SCOTUS is acting as a trial court, not an appeals court. I don;t believe there is a rulebook for this, unless they use the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp - https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_12

The 10 am Thursday deadline is set by order here, an order from SCOTUS to the defendant states.

Without having read any of the filings (been busy with paying work and family issues), plaintiff states will have to prove (preponderance, 51% probability) the election contests in those states are certified on fraudulent returns. The remedy part has one possibility that I think works. Enjoin defendant states from certification either way. Flawed election process. The states can then choose to have their legislatures choose, or send no electors to US Congress.


184 posted on 12/09/2020 12:41:35 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson