BREAKING: SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT BROUGHT BY TEXAS

Twitter ^ | 8 Dec 20 | Anonymous Patriot

[BlackFemaleArmyColonel]

SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT BROUGHT BY TEXAS.

[Fawn]

I’m going to take a nap and await the evening bombshells.. Signing off ...

Wonder is we can see what was submitted by the 4 states?

[Stormy_MS1]

You can go to https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx and fill in the case number of 22O155 and see the responses that have been filed.

[TeleStraightShooter]

Here yah go

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

[Brown Deer]

106 members of Congress have joined the lawsuit!

[traderrob6]

Anyone have a current list of states signed on?

[Brown Deer]

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

[Sun]

That’s funny. I heard on the radio today that both Thomas and Alito said it should be heard.

[BlackFemaleArmyColonel]

They did respond.

[SamAdams76]

They did respond.

[DoodleDawg]

But the court is reviewing this case. In the decision that Justice Thomas was dissenting on the court did not even allow the plaintiff to file a Bill of Complaint. Texas has filed theirs.

And just because Justice Thomas thinks a case should be heard is not necessarily meaningful. Every single 9 to 0 decision against the plaintiff in an appeals case started when at least four justices thought the case should be heard. We have no idea what the justices are thinking on this case, nor should we.

[Fury]

Re: 310 - Agreed. I think the difference this time is the nature of the case and the issues it touches upon and the change in the makeup of the Court.

I mentioned Thomas specifically because after reading his reasoning in that dissent, I thought he had a compelling argument. but both sides think they have a compelling argument in legal proceedings.

And also mentioned Thomas because ACLJ goofed on what Thomas stated in his dissent.

[BlackFemaleArmyColonel]

I believe AZ and NV didn’t have SecofStates who went around their legislatures and created new election “laws.” The 4 states in question did.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Yeah, that’s not to say that what happened in az and nv was OK, but may they would not be consistent with the lawsuit.

[gleeaikin]

The PA vote was 8 to 0. I would not be too surprised that a similar vote might happen to NOT deal with the Texas issue.