Skip to comments.
SEVEN states have now joined Texas lawsuit
https://www.citizenfreepress.com ^
| 12.08.2020
| Kane
Posted on 12/08/2020 4:13:25 PM PST by rxsid
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 461-480 next last
To: virgil
141
posted on
12/08/2020 4:53:29 PM PST
by
BigEdLB
(All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others-George Orwell)
To: rxsid
“Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Kentucky, Mississippi, South Carolina, South Dakota and Lousiana…”
I don’t know how youall count, but I get to eight.
142
posted on
12/08/2020 4:54:04 PM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon. )
To: cgbg
It’s expected that the crooked Republicans in Georgia will be fighting AGAINST this, to cover up their crimes.
143
posted on
12/08/2020 4:54:11 PM PST
by
Golden Eagle
(********** MERRY CHRISTMAS ***********)
To: fightu4it
Now is the time for Holcomb to do what he does best: stand up and follow.
144
posted on
12/08/2020 4:54:24 PM PST
by
CommieCutter
("Trump is god emperor and he will win." -- some hacker )
To: DoughtyOne
I am going to contact the Arkansas AG and ask her what the remedy is that the states are seeking. That is important information.
To: rod1
Right now it is close to being an SEC vs. Big 10 matchup except for the election fraud travesty that is Georgia.
146
posted on
12/08/2020 4:54:39 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: Lazamataz
Conspicuously absent is Georgia. They're in the suit, as a defendant.
To: Zeddicus
“SCOTUS doesnt have to “negate or reverse” the election because the results are illegitimate and unconstitutional. All they have to do is affirm that.”
Technically true. But by affirming that the election was illegitimate and unconstitutional SCOTUS is for all practical purposes negating the election. Then the Dems can pull an Andy Jackson and declare “SCOTUS has ruled; now let us see them enforce it!” It would go back to the states, and then we are on a sprint toward civil war. THAT is why I can’t see SCOTUS affirming it. Now, I think SCOTUS SHOULD affirm it, but I don’t see it doing so.
148
posted on
12/08/2020 4:55:05 PM PST
by
ought-six
(Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule. )
To: mosaicwolf
Mara Lago the new Free States of America White House?
To: rxsid
Yes, being defrauded after what we know, the physical evidence, which has been supported by statistical evidence and forensic evidence may finally be addressed in a logical way, if that is necessary.
To: rxsid
151
posted on
12/08/2020 4:55:59 PM PST
by
liberalh8ter
(The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
To: Osage Orange
I called Lankford and sent him a nasty email when he said we should accept the election results. He tried to back out of it but nobody believes him
To: rxsid
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner,
v.
KATHY BOOCKVAR, SECRETARY OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.,
Respondents.
______________________
JOSEPH B. SCARNATI III, ET AL., Petitioners,
v.
PENNSYLVANIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, ET AL., Respondents.
______________________
On Petitions for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
BRIEF OF OKLAHOMA, INDIANA, KANSAS, NEBRASKA, TENNESSEE, AND WEST VIRGINIA AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS
CURTIS T. HILL, JR.
INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL
DEREK SCHMIDT
KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL
DOUG PETERSON
NEBRASKA ATTORNEY GENERAL
HERBERT H. SLATERY III TENNESSEE ATTORNEY GENERAL
PATRICK MORRISEY
WEST VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
MIKE HUNTER
OKLAHOMA ATTORNEY GENERAL
MITHUN MANSINGHANI SOLICITOR GENERAL COUNSEL OF RECORD
BRYAN CLEVELAND
ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
OKLAHOMA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
313 NE TWENTY-FIRST STREET OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105
(405) 521-3921 MITHUN.MANSINGHANI @OAG.OK.GOV
NOVEMBER 9, 2020
COUNSEL FOR AMICI CURIAE
153
posted on
12/08/2020 4:56:29 PM PST
by
Linda Frances
(Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness. )
To: ought-six
then we are on a sprint toward civil war.
This is kinda like Dred Scott--the sprint will continue either way...
154
posted on
12/08/2020 4:56:43 PM PST
by
cgbg
( Remember 1876--we _can_ do this!--Biden--Office of the Prisoner-Elect)
To: rxsid
We NEED Kanas, Iowa, Montana, Idaho, North Dakota, Utah, AZ.
To: BigEdLB
Didn’t Elon Musk sell those?!
156
posted on
12/08/2020 4:58:25 PM PST
by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
To: Jess Kitting
I heard today the Supreme Court has already agreed to hear this case.
To: ought-six
SCOTUS is not going to negate or reverse the election.
That’s not what they’d be expected to do. Their job is to rule that the defendant states violated the constitution by changing their election rules without proper legislative action/consent. An “emergency Covid directive” by the Secretary of State is clearly NOT a legislative action. Therefore these state’s elections should be ruled unconstitutional and they should be directed to select their electors in a constitutional manner. Either by a new statewide general election, or by vote of their state legislature. It won’t be up to SCOTUS to determine how. It will be up to the elected legislature of each affected state. And if they are unable, their electoral votes will be 0.
The only wrinkle I can see is if the individual state legislature previously granted broader authority to their SOS to be able to make such rules and changes without legislative consent.
I think it all comes down to this.
To: Trump Girl Kit Cat
To: Linda Frances
160
posted on
12/08/2020 4:59:25 PM PST
by
BigEdLB
(All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others-George Orwell)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 461-480 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson