Completely wrong...
“Legal challenges” to the Legislature’s decision... on what grounds ?
The CONSTITUTION REQUIRES that is the Legislature’s duty ?
It doesn’t say HOW they do what they do... but it says, when they do it... that’s it. The left saying “when state officials certify a result, that’s it”... are wrong. That’s not their job... beyond what the legislature directs... and it the legislature directs something else... the something else is what is legitimate, and nothing else is.
The Constitution... does not empower courts to second guess the legislature ? The legislature IS THE COURT that decides this issue...
On the grounds that there is a slate of electors selected by the voters and certified by the state in accordance with the laws in place on election day, and there is a second slate of electors appointed by the legislature after the election results were known. Two slates of electors, I guarantee the courts will have to decide which is the valid one.
On the grounds that there is a slate of electors selected by the voters and certified by the state in accordance with the laws in place on election day, and there is a second slate of electors appointed by the legislature after the election results were known. Two slates of electors, I guarantee the courts will have to decide which is the valid one.