Posted on 12/07/2020 10:30:18 AM PST by SeekAndFind
“No person shall be...deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...”
Amendment V might be used to prevent laws enacted during the first four years of a Biden presidency from taking “life, liberty, or property” if they were not passed by veto-proof majorities of Congress.
The election fraud excecuted with the connivance of public officials, even if it was undoubtedly not significant enough to hand the presidency to Biden, is undoubtedly a denial of the due process of law.
The Amendment V 2020 election due process violations would likely block the federal enactment of any new tax, including any new tax on guns or ammo, any new federal law punitive measure (including those related to mask-wearing even when solely to be enforced by financially co-opted states) and any significantly large federal debt ceiling increase which must inevitably result in property deprivation impacting at least one person.
So many ways the Court can go that rule in our favor but grant no remedy.
My guess is that Kavanaugh will be the weak link and side with Roberts. He was a DC insider and, I suspect, would lick the toilets of the DC insider clubhouse clean if it meant he could regain admittance. Yes, despite what they did to him, I suspect he would eagerly accept anything for admittance.
Even if he sides with the other 4 Conservatives, I suspect we will get something along the lines of:
Yes, mail in is unconstitutional as it is non-verifiable, violates the principle of one person one vote and this robs voters of equal protection under the law,
BUT
it’s too late for this election and this ruling only affects elections going forward.
If not, I think big time bad will break across this country.
Dershowitz is the ultimate lawyer. Give an opinion and then give another reason it may not work.
Cake and eat it too. $$$ to find out what is behind the magic door ......
Neither do I... But if state legislatures do submit slates of electors that differ from their governors' "certified" slates to the Congress, 3 USC §s 5 & 15 would be in effect. Then, all sorts of Congressional maneuvering could result in delays resulting in Acting President Pelosi. As somebody once said, what a revoltin' development...
That is entirely true, but, they havent the guts until someone forces them to act.
I have it on good authority that Trump WILL BE THE VCITOR.
The same Hand of Divine Providence that miraculously birthed our nation by defeating the world’s greatest military power is at work today against the odds.
If we’re going to rely on state legislatures that have a majority of establishment Republicans to do the right thing, we are probably scr*wed.
Same if we’re going to have to rely on the House in a contingent election. Even though the Republicans have a majority in State delegations, I have no faith that they would elect President Trump to a second term.
The only reliable path is a secure, legal vote by the people. In that scenario, Trump wins easily.
We need new elections in PA, MI, WI, GA, AZ, and NV.
Gottcha. Good points. OK, well, I believe this thing will end up with SCOTUS anyway, so let’s have at it.
And OBTW, Trump WILL be victorious.
:)
We’ll simply have to endure or emigrate.
The close-to-communist enemy is far too numerous, generally well-hidden and physically remote to be dealt with in the fashion of our Founding Fathers.
RE: If we’re going to rely on state legislatures that have a majority of establishment Republicans to do the right thing, we are probably scr*wed
CONCLUSION: Say hello to to President Joe Biden.
Actually Boise3981 has a good argument for SCOTUS involvement right now.
(See post # 38).
So we are a nation of laws...laws nobody understands and are constantly in dispute.
“He’s the man who refuses to take any stance that will be perceived as political at all.”
He may have to as it falls under Constitutional law. The Equal Protection Clause is from the text of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides “nor shall any State ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”. It mandates that individuals in similar situations be treated equally by the law.
If Biden was given preference, or votes were changed which illegally disenfranchise the voters, and there is beyond reasonable doubt a possible rigging of the election using these two situations alone, it will cause the election to be recounted using preventative actions to shut down the graft at the least. If it is found not to be done, then there is no harm no foul. And graft found will determine further investigating of the process which could uncover even more than they already have.
If little is found, and corrected, then justice will almost be done. The next step is to convict all who played a part from the vote counter to the top of the ladder no matter how littel was done. Like the FBI man in National Treasure said, “Somebody has to go to jail.” And the canaries will sing before the condors.
wy69
In God I trust, and maybe Jim W N as well. 8>)
“No one doubt’s the legislature’s supreme ability to choose the method of appointing electors.”
“But can they change their mind after an election?” Yes
“After safe harbor?” Yes
“After the electoral college votes?” No
The word “may” is of the future tense and therefore the “may direct” part appears to have a remedial intent in my opinion.
I don't think they will step down from their duty to invalidate the results in the six states that are disputed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.