Note the change in Arizona, today, also ?
An initial audit of a small sample showed 2% error... enough the change the election. An expanded sample showed 11% error... “massive” fraud.
Georgia and Arizona matter... because the proof of fraud is there, already... making the denials of fraud even being an issue pointless.
That matters in its TIMING, too... because as the case TIMELY goes to the SCOTUS, one of the realities is that judges react to context. If there “might have been a bit of fraud” but there wasn’t evidence or proof it mattered in changing results, the justices might still demur in taking up the case, and might allow the “news media” to get away with lying that redefines reality in context.
Because there are solid proofs of fraud, now, and clear showing that fraud was sufficient to alter results... and as the TREND continues to expand the mass of evidence ? Makes the context work FOR the Trump argument, not against it...
Actually, it turns the media refusal to see the fraud... into a proof of the fraud being far more extensive than the liars want you to know...
Trump is winning this...