Thank you for explaining this.
Science is benefitting from murder. Clearly that is wrong.
The vaccine is probably not that questionable. Do you want to take that bet?
The vaccine is not relying on murder for its production, ergo the fact that one benefits is not at all grevious. It is a clear case of something very remote, which medical science benefits from all the time.
Cadavers for medical practice were being carved up in Catholic universities throughout the western world for many years for example. Some of those might also have been murder cases.
"Probably" is a disturbing word when describing a mostly untested vaccine.
Besides being immoral, I find the the vaccine to be highly questionable health wise. There have been all types of warnings about side effects, mostly concerning heart attacks, strokes, bells palsy and sterility. Imagine that: an aborted baby girl causing sterility.
Some of those might also have been murder cases.
And what about it? Fetal stem cells have been and still are available from umbilical cords and placentas.
Why is infanticide such a necessity?
Because big pharma has invested so much time and dollars, since the 70's instead of starting over again. It's all about the money.