Dominion in Georgia is the story of votes switched from Trump to Biden.
The number of paper ballots would still match the machine total number of ballots.
You do get that, right?
The “recount” just proved that the machines switched the votes without any inadvertent errors. ;-)
But a signature audit, matching signatures on a time-line, would disqualify those ballots cast at the time the envelope came in. 1:10 Alfred E. Neuman envelope received, along with Joe Namath, Tom Mix and John Jaekel Jingleheimer Schmidt, all of whom did not have legitimate addresses or residence in Georgia. You kick out the ballots that were cast at that time, or were time-stamped at that time. Plus ballots without time-stamps, or 1,000 with the exact same time-stamp or otherwise obviously manufactured ballots.
The number of paper ballots would still match the machine total number of ballots.
You do get that, right?
The “recount” just proved that the machines switched the votes without any inadvertent errors. ;-)
Let me see if I can explain. But if you can explain to me what I'm missing, I would be glad to hear it.
In Georgia, you made your election selections on a touchscreen. After first validating your selections on the touchscreen, it then came up with a screen which asked you to print the ballot. After printing, which came out for me to my hands, the touchscreen asked the voter to validate their selections and confirm by pressing the touchscreen.
So, a paper ballot is produced which is checked by the voter. All of the voter selections for ballot races and questions are shown in English text on the ballot. The ballot also had a QR code.
Next in the process was "casting" the ballot. For me that was taking my printed ballot to the poll worker that was scanning them through the Dominion voting machine. They took my ballot and scanned it through the system which read the QR code and tabulated and reported the selections electronically. Those were the results we saw on the initial counting of the ballots.
It is important to note that Georgia was required by a judge to change their electronic voting system and use a system that produced an auditable paper ballot that could later be hand recounted to validate the electronic counting system. That is the Dominion system. After the election, Raffensperger ordered the legislated and required "Risk Limiting Audit" of the Dominion computer system using the Presidential race, except that the surprise move and at security experts' recommendations (see Garland Favorito) all of the paper ballots were hand counted by reading the text choices which were validated by each voter.
The hand count of the paper ballots produced results validating the results produced by the electronic system. One set of ballots, two kinds of counting systems, one result. So, there weren't paper ballots that were run multiple times through the electronic system or that would have been exposed. There weren't votes switched in the electronic system or that would have been exposed. There weren't problems with the QR code or that would have been exposed. So for the Presidential race in Georgia, no machine fraud was exposed. This move gave anyone interested in really finding out if there was machine fraud in Georgia our best way to expose it.
How do you suppose the hand count, which is not the "recount" going on this past week which used the machine and which was the third counting of the ballots now in Georgia, would have handled the votes which were switched by machines? The machines were not involved or used in any way in the Risk Limited Audit of 100% of the paper ballots.