Replies

Well, there was early voting and in person voting on Election day too. Regardless, all forms of voting result in a paper ballot which is scanned by the Dominion system and tabulated. Thus, all ballots counted have a Dominion machine count and the paper evidence.

The number of paper evidences were gathered and hand recounted. The votes tabulated in the system separate from Dominion validated the same result as reported by Dominion.

If an invalid paper ballot was allowed into the system, that really can't be classified as "machine fraud" and wouldn't involve a server in Germany, etc. As I have offered before, even Trump realized this because he said the hand count would just come up with the same number as the computers did because the process does not exclude the invalid ballots.

Anyway, the quickest way to know if there was machine fraud is to do exactly what Georgia and Raffensperger ordered, a 100% hand count of the paper ballots and then compare that count to the machine count. Why would Kemp and Raffensperger have any doubt about the validity of that effort when the results and outcome matched?

I can supply you links to the spreadsheets, etc. It's a dry hole and I asked at the time what the motive of those were who continued to push the point and to smear Kemp and Raffensperger. Why accuse them of bribes which prevent them from investigating when the state already did the 100% hand recount and validated the system, at least for the Presidential race?

I continue to ask that. Why pour efforts down a dry hole for so long when there is more potential in looking for evidence of invalid ballots? I have been saying that for over two weeks now. Of course I get raked over the coals for doing so but sooner or later we have to hold ourselves to be accountable on being willing to be shown facts. The fact is that the reported votes for the Presidential race was not manipulated by the Dominion system.

all forms of voting result in a paper ballot which is scanned by the Dominion system and tabulated. Thus, all ballots counted have a Dominion machine count and the paper evidence. The number of paper evidences were gathered and hand recounted. The votes tabulated in the system separate from Dominion validated the same result as reported by Dominion. If an invalid paper ballot was allowed into the system, that really can't be classified as "machine fraud"

Trying to recite your Dominion textbook to us again as a filibuster is lame. Let’s talk about how all the fraud that came out in the hearing today has blown this wide open.

Did you see the lady who said that the ACLU had agents there, determining if people were eligible to vote, which is against state law?

How about the fact that Dominion employees ran the whole operation, when state law says it’s supposed to be state employees?

Or the lady that proves that there was no chain of custody on ballots that were being brought in for counting?

That’s just a few off he top of my head, but let’s here your excuses for all that.