Replies

A hand count without a signature audit and an envelope audit is just more fraud of the mail-in ballots.
The machine issue is a separate one, (equally fracked up, imho).

The governor and SOS own this—all of it (paper and machine)—their fault—nowhere to hide—nobody to blame.

We simply cannot continue to conflate the two issues of machine fraud and invalid ballots. It makes us look ignorant.

In Georgia, the system printed paper ballots that were verified by the voter (there was a printed summary of all selections) and then the ballot was scanned by the Dominion scanner and tabulated. The paper ballot that was scanned was then secured for the potential of being counted by hand at a later time. Raffensperger made the excellent decision to hand recount ALL BALLOTS for the Presidential race and to compile the results without the aid from the Dominion scanners and tabulators. The Election result was the same.

Dominion was proven a dry hole and all this bluster just doesn't do us any good and it won't in court either. Even if we prove Venezuela used it to elect Chavez, there wasn't machine fraud in Georgia.

Anyway, the I have maintained that the fraud, if present in Georgia, would have to be somewhere else besides the Dominion voting system. All that wasted energy about Kemp and Raffensperger having accepted huge bribes from Dominion, and all that crap is just that in my opinion. Crap. When I'm proven wrong on machine fraud everyone is welcome to come pummel me with mud. Until then, let's not conflate signature matching and illegal ballots with Dominion machine fraud.

I am still taken aback a bit that the woman in the presentation said they just found this video evidence the evening before. That in itself worries me a bit about how this stands up now that it is out in the open. Maybe there is an explanation that will win the day but it sure doesn't look like it to me. Let's look at signatures.