Yup. When someone says loony things while claiming authority, I'll label them appropriately. I'm not going to feel bad about that. If he said the vaccines were made with DNA from aliens or Sasquatch, I'd laugh at him then too. Say ridiculous things, get laughed at. Seems fair to me.
"lifelong negative side effects to the immune system"
Pure speculation based on nothing. There's a word for this: FUD. It means Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. It describes when somebody is just trying to scare people with no actual basis behind it because they have an agenda.
"I won’t dismiss him just because I don’t want to admit I have been lied to by the media and main stream AMA medicine for almost a year now."
Why wouldn't someone want to admit that the media is a bunch of lying incompetent idiots? I happily sing that song all the time. Same with politicians: bunch of lying fools, nearly every last one of them.
"I would rather have anti-bodies to this illness and be done with it."
What do you think the vaccine gives you? (Hint: it's antibodies). But instead of getting the infectious disease that's destroying your lung tissue and creating blood clots (which, if we're talking about what long term effects we don't fully understand yet, are far more worrying than anything with the vaccines), you get harmless antigens that spur antibody creation through the natural immune system processes.
"Several treatments exist for it that are 100% effective for those who are high risk."
Any doctor who tells you they have a 100% effective treatment for anything is lying to you. And 99% of doctors will tell you exactly the same thing. No treatment is ever 100% effective. None. There are exceptions in literally every single case based on the specific physiology, genetics, and medical history of each individual patient. You might have an extremely effective treatment that works 99% of the time, but that 1% still exists. And in a nation of 330 million people, 1% is 3,300,000 exceptions.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Thomas Borody
So what’s YOUR authority on this subject?
“Any doctor who tells you they have a 100% effective treatment for anything is lying to you.”
You are making a classic mistake with basic logic. The syllogism you are trying to create is called Ferio.
E = universal negative
I = particular affirmative
O = particular negative conclusion
It goes like this:
All doctors who claim 100% cure rate are not telling the truth
Dr. Thomas Borody claims a 100% cure rate for Covid-1984
Therefore, Dr. Thomas Borody is a liar.
The flaw here is in the first premise. The first premise is not honest of you. In layman’s terms it is what is called speaking in broad strokes, a hasty generalization.
Any reasonable person would say that the best you can say is that “Most doctors who claim 100% cure rate are not telling the truth”, which is a particular negative, not a universal negative. Now look at the syllogism:
Most doctors who claim 100% cure rate are not telling the truth
Dr. Thomas Borody claims a 100% cure rate for Covid-1984
Therefore, Dr. Thomas Borody is a liar.
Anyone can see this is not a valid syllogism.
If you took the time to listen to or research what this kind doctor has to say, you would have known that even he was surprised that his drug cocktail was 100% effective against the China virus. No, he doesn’t make any money by sharing this with us. It is a dirt cheap cocktail of ivermectin, zinc sulfate, and doxycycline. Note: This information will become more important later when Covid-23 is released, as this treatment is virus-agnostic. Any vaccine they make for Covid-1984 will only work on one strain of it, just like the flu, and there are many now in the wild. This information was completely suppressed by the lame stream media.