Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SteveH

The PA supreme court ruled against Kelly et all for laches. Saying they took to long to file and the voting has taken place which to undo would cause harm to the defendant. But a prior case was thrown out because the plaintiff lacked standing as there was no harm. Election hadn’t occurred yet. The scum on PA supreme court want it both ways. No one can sue before the election and anyone suing after the election waited too long. The supreme court could take the case, rule on the laches (timeliness) and remand back to the PA supreme to do their job and rule on the unconstitutionality of Act 77, the mail in ballot act.


14 posted on 12/02/2020 5:14:15 AM PST by kvanbrunt2 (spooks won on day 76)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: kvanbrunt2

thank you for those backgrounder details... wow, that PA SC ruling seems unjust to me and i would not trust the PA SC to do anything over a grudging minimum to get it off their docket if the USSC remanded the case back to them... argh...


16 posted on 12/02/2020 9:44:39 AM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson