Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aqua225

“Given how unstable the reactor was, I go with natural”

I see you are doubling down. Keep your day job!


178 posted on 02/17/2021 3:59:50 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGator

Well tell me which it was and why. Obviously you’re clueless since you can’t answer.

Do you even know what natural metal is? It is pure uranium, whose natural u235 component has not been artificially increased by enrichment. It does not mean rocks. The first us reactor had zero enrichment as well. It’s a lot cheaper, but CANDU reactors can do this feat as well, but much more safely.

The way I see it you are the one doubling down...


183 posted on 02/17/2021 4:13:39 PM PST by Aqua225 (Realist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson