“You got it backwards.”
It’s possible that I’m naive here. I figure that a court considers evidence and if not compelling will give their reasons for reaching that conclusion and we all can see that reasoning.
The fraud deniers to my knowledge haven’t publicly discussed the evidence of fraud. They just say “baseless claims”.
I believe Trump won and don’t understand why the evidence of that is dismissed. I don’t understand why Trump’s hotshot lawyers haven’t convinced the people that need convincing.
The judges are bias and courts/political class have been ignoring fraud for decades. No amount of evidence is going to get the court system to expose the fraud in a lower courts selected by the political class. I don’t think there is anyone on this planet (including judges) that honestly thinks cheating doesn’t exists.