They good guys have had a month to prove otherwise.
A week after the election, Freepers who asked 'were is the evidence' were ridiculed by the 'we don't need evidence' faction of FR.
Two weeks after the election, Freepers who asked 'were is the evidence' were ridiculed by the 'we don't need evidence' faction of FR.
A month after the election, Freepers who asked 'were is the evidence' are still in the right asking such a rudimentary question.
Which court has accepted evidence that proves without a doubt that the great Donald J Trump is going to POTUS for four more years? Link please.
If all we have is unsubstantiated rumors of servers taken from Afghani camel *uckers.....
Just shut the hell up. No court has heard evidence because they refuse to grant an evidentiary hearing. They claim ether that the suits are too early and lack standing. Or the damage is already done, too late there is no remedy. An impossible catch 22. As for transparency, Trumps team has not been allowed to review signatures in any state but Wisconsin, where they found 160k illegal votes.
Which judge in which court has allowed an evidentiary hearing?
Which judge has even allowed real evidence to be gathered from a real audit?
You seam to have a definite opinion so I'll look for your answer.