From what most of us have seen and read so far this looks like a valid statement.Here's the problem. How can anyone call this recent "vote" an election. Its more of a fraudulent effort at pre-selecting a candidate than what we know as an election. It just was not an election it was not even close to being an election it was a planned coronation of one party so well planned you cant or should not use the word election. Seen in that light maybe scotus can look at it using a different view. There was nothing fair or balanced or legal about the recent election. So scotus would not be electing or selecting a potus merely slapping down criminality which is their job. IF they cant punish criminals who can?
Good points...my pet word for the “election” is burlesque. If, perhaps hopefully, state legislatures or the Congress were to be sued for electing Trump; I would say there is a good chance they would prevail at the SCOTUS. Roberts etc. would have a hard time, IMO, bucking that one. And the situation you describe would also be very difficult for the court to ignore and have any credibility in the matter. Of course, the courts have in the past spared murderers.