Replies

I see how virtually nothing was done before the election to stop fraud,

One would have to go through all the cases to see whether there were actually a lot of missed opportunities, but my understanding is that there was an attempt to fix things, but the cases were discarded by the courts as lacking standing as there had not yet been any actual harm.

I seem to recall one PA State Court case filed by GOP, then dismissed by the trial court for timeliness. As I recall, the PA Supreme Court declined to overturn the decision.

Part of the problem with us Monday morning quarterbacking is that we still don’t know all the details. According to PA law, to qualify for mail in ballots, voters needed to provide a drivers license number, address, and last 4 of SSN. I am not sure if Rudy is alleging that this law was not carried out correctly? Were the names and drivers license numbers and SSNs matched against a data base? Or could anyone request a bunch of ballots by giving fake data?

If poll watchers were denied proper access, what were they covering up? The logical conclusion is that extra ballots were illegally generated and somehow delivered at pre-planned time windows to poll counting stations. The timing had to be planned correctly, so that the right poll counters would be on duty, and the poll watchers would be held at bay.

I still don’t know. And because I still don’t know the exact details of the misconduct, I cannot speculate as to how it could have been prevented before the fact.

Hopefully a competent court will look at the evidence and render just relief.