[Jim Noble]

The way I read this ruling is that if Trump can prove 81,001 fraudulent votes

And if your Aunt had balls, she's be your Uncle.

What you state is impossible to prove. Not "prove" in the sense that you or I believe it.

I mean, prove by a preponderance of the evidence in a court of competent jurisdiction to the satisfaction of a panel of judges expert in law and in the Constitution.

That is just not going to happen, and it is shameful to exploit people's hopes, and it's triply shameful to be fundraising off of it.

[nicollo]

And if your Aunt had balls, she's be your Uncle.

I'll take your disgusting insult as admission of your pathetic arguments here.

G'nite, sweetie pie!

[MIA_eccl1212]

And yet on january 30 donald trump will still be president of the usa..