[Williams]

Uh folks, this was a disastrous decision written by the Trump appointed Judge.

But all you legal scholars think this is great.

Until you see someone show a court that enough votes should be switched, there will be no change.

No, it’s not a victory.

[mooncoin]

Same. Can someone explain to me how this is great?

The Federal government’s own Electoral College page (https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/2020) already has the president as Biden & shows the PA electors for Biden (https://www.archives.gov/files/electoral-college/2020/ascertainment-pennsylvania.pdf)

[OldGoatCPO]

I agree, this seems to be about those 10,000 votes that were illegal? The District Court said the same thing. Not enough bad ballots to justify disenfranchising 7 million voters. They lost the argument in District Court and now in the Appellate Court. What makes anyone believe the SCOTUS will buy this argument. I am not sure SCOTUS would even hear this case? What about the case if any about the SOS and Governor violating the State Constitution? If I understand correctly, to change a voting law under the PA Constitution there had to be a referendum. That seems to my non-legal mind a better case to toss 600,000 illegal mail in ballots.

[wardaddy]

Thank u

Freepers live on Mars

[deadrock]

Apparently, half of Freepers believe no evidence(as in, court accepted and verified evidence) is required to successfully stop the steal.

There are in for a shock.

[MIA_eccl1212]

Until you see someone show a court that enough votes should be switched, there will be no change...

‐‐—————————————————

Rofl.
WRONG but very funny.

[DrewsMum]

I thought this was about equal protection and they’re asking for the counties that broke PA election law to be investigated.

No?