Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MCEscherHammer
But once at SCOTUS, can Rudy, et al. change the pleading to reveal the fraud, like the 600,000/3,200 vote spike switcheroo data...?

I don’t think so. The Supreme Court does not hear evidence, only arguments of law. If the campaign tried to introduce new evidence, SCOTUS could send it back to a lower court. Appeals are generally limited to arguments about procedural errors or incorrect application of the law.

This belief in some quarters that the Trump campaign’s lawyers are sitting on a pile of damning evidence and only waiting until it’s in the Supreme Court to show it is absurd.

232 posted on 11/27/2020 1:24:10 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels."--Tom Waits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep
This belief in some quarters that the Trump campaign’s lawyers are sitting on a pile of damning evidence and only waiting until it’s in the Supreme Court to show it is absurd.

Worth repeating.

277 posted on 11/27/2020 3:03:04 PM PST by Widget Jr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson