[cgbg]

Multiple arrest would have already happened.

I keep referring to the Election of 1876, and most folks have no clue what I am talking about...

The fraud in that election was _massive_, which was proven by the ridiculous increase in "voter turnout" figures, just like in 2020.

Nobody of any significance went to jail for that fraud in 1876.

Nobody.

So, we have historical precedent for a decoupling of criminal prosecution and the actual choosing of a President, even with evidence of massive fraud.

If we fail, there will be plenty of time to Monday morning quarterback--but we are _not_ there today.

[rollo tomasi]

Did the United States in 1876 have this suppose tech tracking, let alone the ability to launch satellites into orbit, to witness fraud in real-time?

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "we have historical ( precedent for a decoupling of criminal prosecution and the actual choosing of a President, even with evidence of massive fraud"

We have people going to jail for this fraud of 2020 in Philadelphia. I would be surprised if no one goes to jail for the threats against Emily Murphy.

It does give me hope things are moving our way forcefully

https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3908985/posts?page=3#3