When you are listening to hear what you WANT to hear, rather than listening to is objectively...I guess you would say that.
Powell going on about this being a “communist plot” might “sound good” to you. But it makes her sound like a 1950s nut.
You are thinking about this “battle” over what is “truth.” If they keep rambling like that: The truth will never get the chance to come out.
That is not how media works these days. And without media, you ain’t gonna win. I would think you would understand this by now.
The media is not going to “eat” anything fed to them by Trump. Instead of saying the system was owned by Commies and people paid to win, you say that the system is owned and operated on foreign soil. It is not run by ANY representative of ANY American government. You don’t accuse people of paying off the company unless you have bank records.
I know these are “opening statements.” I am willing to wait for the courts. But I will remind you that “opening statements” are not evidence. A lawyer can lie through their teeth and propose their defense (or prosecution) during an opening statement.
You saw an opening statement. I wish they would hire someone who knows how to communicate for their evidentiary statements. Because their opening statement was OK, but it was lost in the last ten minutes.
I will have to watch it again, but I don't recall her using that language. She referred to Communist countries having created the election software (maybe hardware, too, I will have to listen more closely). I do want to tell you that I understand how easy it is to mistake what others are saying, especially because we all tend to have a log in our eye. When I have seen your comments on this forum it has often occurred to me that you may be a DU/DNC/deep state plant.
You are thinking about this “battle” over what is “truth.” If they keep rambling like that: The truth will never get the chance to come out.
The truth will prevail in the end. Everything hidden will be exposed. Jesus said so.
That is not how media works these days. And without media, you ain’t gonna win. I would think you would understand this by now.
I think you may be wrong about this. It's also another statement that makes me think you may be part of that group.
A lawyer can lie through their teeth and propose their defense (or prosecution) during an opening statement.
Not this time. There is hard evidence -- witnesses, affidavits, the stuff of truth.
I wish they would hire someone who knows how to communicate for their evidentiary statements. Because their opening statement was OK, but it was lost in the last ten minutes.
This is another statement that leads to the impression you are DNC Media: All of the rest of us on this thread were impressed and enlivened by the whole presser. We are so grateful that our Free Republic is being defended so well by these great legal minds!
You are the fucking nut and are a waste of time not worth debating.