Not trying to be a jerk here, but I need to ask - why does FR continue to allow the use of GP as a source? The site is infamous for publishing click-bait nonsense. Most of what GP posts never proves factual.
It came from John Solomon.
That is not true.
That is not true.
This article is John Solomon who’s pretty solid
Not Hoft who is a prevaricator
You’re not the only one. A lot of people are exploiting us for clicks and attention. It’s been going on for a while but since the election it’s become a torrent of wet BS. It’s coming from both the left and right for different reasons.
“why does FR continue to allow the use of GP as a source?”
I like to hear what people like Lou Dobbs. John Solomon, etc., have to say. If it’s GP or the Easter Bunny that provides that information to me, I’m grateful.