[Svartalfiar]

right. secure those machines Mr. President. we need to see the source code. it’s the hockey stick all over again.

This isn't source code, which was almost certainly self-deleting or removed asap after the fraud. This case is the images of the scanned ballots, which could show that the same ballot was scanned multiple times in a row, or other issues with the actual ballots used for the machine counting. Of course, them deleting these images just mean that the total image count won;t line up with the number of votes cast - so there's an obvious discrepancy that should invalidate all votes on that machine anyway.

[dadfly]

thanks for your comment. got that from the blurb.

my comment stemmed from reading between the lines in the report. it sounds like this guy Ron is looking at a copy of source code to me (full disclosure, am an engineer with many years experience).

i.e., ‘“Ron” has announced a discovery of a major flaw in Dominion software’’
‘
all legal or auditable software/firmware in my experience must never ‘delete’ anything. in fact, such software must journal any attempt to do so. thus source code which allows “deletion” without a journal of the fact is a major red flag. but, we need to see the firmware/software on the machines. to confirm that outside of Ron’s observation. the more the better. ergo my comment.

[lepton]

This case is the images of the scanned ballots,

---

One of the reasons for refusing certification on this device was that the images were often very oddly unclear.