You can prove machines switched votes. But I think forensically proving that a particular machine switched a particular vote, and proving that 140,000 times, is a pretty tough job.
Your a sickening fool. The vote switching is done by the point receiving the machine counts, not at the amchines themselves. I believe you know that and are purposely spreading your master’s lies.
“But I think forensically proving that a particular machine switched a particular vote, and proving that 140,000 times, is a pretty tough job.”
Then you throw all of those votes out. Who says that illegal votes need to stand? When you mingle illegal votes with legal votes, you are still disenfranchising the legal voters.
“You can prove machines switched votes. But I think forensically proving that a particular machine switched a particular vote, and proving that 140,000 times, is a pretty tough job.”
Actually LS you are wrong, the machine leaves a trail, it can tell you what that was before the switch. Also, the machine photocopies on disc EVERY VOTE that passed thru it, as in every vote.