Specious thinking. The fact that an amount is named does not make it verifiably true, as much as we would like it to be. I hope it is true, but the fact that someone has some number is not the reason why it is true.
—
Do you understand Qsnatch? Making ordinary people understand electronic fraud is very difficult to put in simple terms.
Here’s an example:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/scUpSRkNoJ9g/
That’s the presentation I saw. Thank you for posting it!
Yes, I understand Qsnatch. Problem is we need the proof of the vote tabulation changes made with it. One of the chaners (forget who) has asked for anyone with this info to contact him.