Unfortunately i'm seeing some posts there that seem to indicate these numbers may be based on not-so-solid data:
ThrowawayBrit 2 points 9 minutes ago +2 / -0 Yes. Like others on here I realised pretty quickly that it was predicated on counting rounding errors. It went surprisingly far and wide on Twitter regardless, made it to The Gateway Pundit and now presumably to OANN.
oh_hi_solidarity 1 point 6 minutes ago +1 / -0 The analysis is improper. You need to do a trend analysis of the final results vs baselines like Shiva. The original post here was flawed due to unreliability of timestamps data + precision rounding errors.
Manneq 1 point 6 minutes ago +1 / -0 We aren't sure if the edison data is the actual voting results. Therefore it wouldn't be evidence of anything really, not before we know for sure. And we don't.
KleineSchlachtmusik 1 point 7 minutes ago +1 / -0 Well, we'd like to think his team has inside info and will drop a bomb that will actually fix this mess. It's only unfortunate if he's sharing these reports for public opinion purposes but they don't have the goods. Hoping they come through and some traitors are punished.
All of it was monitored in real time and recorded. Grand juries are in place.
The Biden’s were deemed foreign agents since the laptop was discovered and handed over last year. FISA warrants in place.
Trump is encouraging his base but the real bombs are yet to come.