Worthless info unless it can be proven.
Hoping it can be proven.
I agree. This is essentially quoting anonymous Twitter users doing anonymous analysis on unverified data. Hope all this is true.
except....perhaps....in framing the issue in context of public opinion, which, alas, is part of the war we are in.....
this fact going out to We The People is pushing the conflict into the open, and it’s going to be We The People against the state/Zuckerberg
Read the assertion again. The fact that an amount is named tells you there is a statistical trail which allowed ‘someone’ to get a firm count of how many votes were switched and deleted.
If this is the PEDE data again, it is bogus. He is using NYT .json files to prove election fraud. You can prove bad web design my the NYT that is about all.
Of course you do
I could be wrong, but it seems to me (based on observation of events past and present) that Pres. Trump normally doesn't Tweet or re-Tweet about something unless he's pretty sure it has legs ...
“Worthless info unless it can be proven.”
And irrefutable proof is useless if the courts choose to ignore it. The can “deem” it inadequate or irrelevant.
I’m hopeful they won’t, at the USSC level, at least.
He’s not sending this tweet to give hope to us Freepers who are already on his side.... He is trying to influence public opinion, in addition to his legal fight.....Jeez Louise....Everybody here is so fixated on wishing for the iron clad, incontrovertible smoking gun, that we cannot see the forest for the trees... luckily Trump is a lot smarter than the average Freeper
Count the votes by hand. The logs in the machines will only show errors but not what happened. The system is wrought with security holes. Tracks can be covered. Hopefully dhs has the real time traffic stored for decomposure.
It doesn’t matter one bit to a democrat voter, I imagine cheating is ok with them and or no matter they will say trump cheated in finding this out. On the flip side Biden and senior Democrats have been awfully quiet during this period. Usually they Yelp about anything so wondering if silence is them trying not to incriminate themselves
The only way it will be proven is by hand counting the ballots by precinct to either find over votes or undervotes...(a tabulation count showing x amount of ballots but finding out that the actual ballots at hand don’t match what the tabulator says there are). Over votes by showing that you have more ballots then there are voters in a district or precinct or you find sealed vote boxes with less ballots in them vs what the manifest says.(Meaning the ballots were run thru the counters multiple times). If the tabulators were switching votes by algorithm then the hand counts will uncover uncover the fraud. The so called massive number of single vote ballots for Biden(especially in Ga) with no down ticket votes may also be uncovered as digital vapor wear when they fail to find the numbers of physical ballots with biden’s vote on them.
its been proven ... numerous sources have cited the magnitude of Dominion’s treachery, but not any actual numbers until now - mostly because doing a forensic analysis is extremely complex.
Further, most of us would not understand many of the terms nor methods. How many ordinary people would understand Qsnatch and other similar products? Electronic fraud is not something that can be pointed to like a paper ballot.
There’s a detailed raw data analysis being done on this which supports the claim.
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/
Scroll past the all caps to find the data analysis, and explanation of what it means.
“””Worthless info unless it can be proven.
Hoping it can be proven.”””
I agree. In the meantime what can FReepers be doing in terms of their own analysis of the data.
For instance, one piece of data I am looking for is the COUNTY NAMES in all States where Dominion is used.
We need to start focusing on those individual counties.