“FORENSIC audit.”
Good point about the PR optics 2ndA— understand that the deputized specialists from Federal Cybersecurity (CISA) have the ability to verify the validity of the ballots themselves— as to the printing SOURCE (without going into methods and tech that is embedded). So this can be done concurrent with the hand recount and require observers inclusive of these people.
Buried in the flurry of reports from ATL/Fulton is one about China’s SFExpress packages being opened (video’d doing it). SFExpress has no service in the US— no pickup stations. So— by private aircraft (or diplomatic pouch to ATL chinese consulate?) Perhaps- but there is no consulate there afaik.
Here: a “Visa” service intermediary- chi-com: https://www.chinaatlanta.org/index-E.htm
China Visa Express-— yes, a chi-com front store.
Connecting the dots with logic. The investigation is of course classified, and not in the hands of the meddlers at see eye ehhh. That, and Pompeo’s confident posts (remember he was see eye ehh director long enough to ferret out the downline embeds holdovers from Brennan). Brennan’s psychotic fearful interview yesterday is another clue. There are still their bad actors around— but they are known, is a logical assumption, if the police work is done skillfully and covertly.
As reasonisfaith has posted-— This examination of ballots would be one aspect of a FORENSIC audit, which may be needed if the dems start playing smarta@@ and even rough. Armed DOJ Agents—the information is also shared with the US Attorneys so directed by Barr, and brought before Grand Juries. To encourage lawful compliance of the demonrat actors if nothing else.
A thorough hand count should show if there is a physical difference between what the system shows and the ballots themselves... but this would only work on paper ballots.
A thorough and deep forensic audit of the software, machines and results is the only way they will be able to truly tell what all of us know took place. This should be done in every state in question.