Posted on 11/08/2020 7:02:34 AM PST by Kaslin
All of these demands and $1.50 will get you a cup of coffee.
My comment was in reference to the author of the article and all who think it makes any sense.
And you are just a little bit thin skinned.
What difference as to who my comment referred?
Since when is being accused of dreaming an offense?
Wow, I must be getting old. When my Dad wanted to describe something as worthless, he said, “That and a dime will get you a cup of coffee”.
You assume that Kameltoe will become Preezy soon after Plugs is sworn in.
So do I. But FWIW, I started researching confiscation soon after Bammy Jug Ears took office. My aside about K.H.’s fingers was meant to imply that “Mr. & Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in!!” is easier said than done at the WH level.
It requires legislation, enforcement, and cooperation by the citizenry just to begin with. It requires a comprehensive plan for confiscation and an order of battle listing available govt manpower down to the state/local level. What it requires but does not have, as in UK & Oz, is guns already registered by the state.
This leaves LE little choice than to invade & search citizens’ homes. Sending officers out to confiscate will require more than superiors saying, “Don’t worry, they’re not going to resist because they wouldn’t dare”.
The only 2ay they can do that is bringing in foriegn troops.
“In Case Democrat Election Fraud Doesn’t Remove Biden”
Well,there are the three boxes:
The Soap Box. We’re currently seeing an organized disinformation and censorship campaign against conservatives and especially President Trump.
The Ballot Box. We are currently witnessing an unprecedented attempt to steal an election.
Ammo Box. This is self explanatory, and we’re closer than ever to having to use this option.
I bet these 3,000 were a percentage of the tabulated votes.
So if it is a percentage, it’s possible that counties with higher numbers would have seen more votes flipped.
“Umm, nope. True, the swing in the one county was 6,000, but that was accomplished by changing 3,000 votes, as stated in the article. Not 6,000.”
************************************************************
If 100,000 people voted in total in the county referenced, and the votes were recorded as Biden 50,000, and Trump 50,000, that would total 100,000.
However, rather than 50,000, instead if Biden’s number was reduced by 3,000, then Biden ended up with 47,000.
Then, if those 3,000 were added correctly to Trump, then rather than 50,000, Trump would end up with 53,000.
This would cause a shift in the difference of 6,000:
Initially 50,000 - 50,000 = 0 difference
then 53,000 (Trump) - 47,000 (Biden) = 6,000 difference
So, a shift in 3,000 caused a difference of 6,000.
You do not have to change anything by 6,000 to end up with a 6,000 vote shift. You only have to reduce one candidate by 3,000 in orde3r to cause a shift of 6,000 between the 2 candidates.
That’s exactly what I said. Changing 3,000 votes caused a 6,000-vote swing in that county. Multiplying by 47 gives 141,000 votes changed, for a swing of twice that, or a 282,000-vote swing for the entire state. It does not mean what the author said, and I quote again, “...282,000 votes would have to be subtracted from Joe Biden’s totals and added to Donald Trump’s...”. The swing is always twice the number of votes changed.
I think we both understand how it works, unlike Jeff What’s-his-name, so I’m not sure what you’re trying to argue about.
Very well stated. A pleasure to see some real sanity in these troubling times...created BY BIDEN”S PARTY, BTW.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.