Once again let me go over this:
the PA case only affects PA. It does NOT apply beyond PA because the case is built on a PA law that said all absentees must be postmarked by Nov. 3. Supposedly, these ballots were “sequestered,” but no one knows if the sequestered ballots were being COUNTED in the overall count so far. If not, it is irrelevant and the court would not hear the case. I.e., if Biteme has “won” by 200,000 and there are only 100,000 sequestered votes, it would be a waste of time.
This has no impact at all on GA, MI, NC, or WI.
The problem there is fraud. But no amount of exposing fraud AFTER an election can cause a revote. All that can happen is that the state legislators, in accordance with the US constitution, can disregard the “winner” of the election and submit a slate of their own choosing.
Now, imagine the media firestorm when that happens. Antifa types on the state reps’ doorsteps. Their kids threatened. Don’t see it happening.
I wasn’t aware that we had previously discussed this and I also wasn’t aware that I had said anything about it going outside of PA, but OK. I did mention systemic problems, but I meant problems inside each state’s system.
Who says they couldn’t throw the whole thing out? The supreme court, is after all ‘supreme’, is it not? Frankly, Zen Master’s reasoning behind the downballot races being the cause really doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me. The court can just toss those out too, since they’re part of the whole mess and make the whole state revote all races.
I can see why the R party wouldn’t want that and wouldn’t ask for it like Zen Master said, but I have to contend that if the USSC wanted to do the least damage and provide the most relief to harmed parties, including the voters, a revote is the only answer that makes sense.
If I’m bothering you or if my thought process is too simplistic for this conversation, just ignore me. I know tempers are short today anyway. :-)