Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We Should Be Very Concerned About Censorship
Townhall.com ^ | October 30, 2020 | Michael Brown

Posted on 10/30/2020 12:48:27 PM PDT by Kaslin

When people as disparate as John Cleese, of Monty Python fame, journalist Piers Morgan, and Intercept co-founder Glenn Greenwald raise their voices in concern, you know that there’s a problem. A very big problem. Censorship by the giants of media and social media has gotten out of control.

Ted Cruz’s grilling of Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has rightly gone viral. Yet the answers given by Dorsey were chilling. To paraphrase, 'Even though we blew it, if the New York Post' – yes, the Post, one of the nation’s leading and historic newspapers – 'wants to access its account again, it must remove the tweet we don’t like.'

In other words, “Play by the rules we make, as uneven and biased as they may be, or we will silence you. And make no mistake about it. We have that power.”

I remember the first time Facebook shut down one of our ministry’s pages and locked me out, along with our page administrator. We had been falsely accused of hate speech, as a result of which we could not post anything to the page or access our account.

Thankfully, I was given the name of someone within Facebook who helped religious organizations, and after reviewing the complaints, Facebook apologized and reinstated our page.

Still, it was a jarring experience.

You work hard for years to cultivate an audience. You spend thousands of hours posting material and interacting with your followers. You build a constituency and they become your co-workers, sharing your material with others.

And then, suddenly, based on false charges by people who themselves are bigoted, you are shut down. Silenced. Cut off from your constituency. Unable to communicate or even explain what has happened. And if you dare cross the line again – so say the ominous warnings you receive the social media gatekeepers – you will be banned for life.

What kind of power is that? It felt like a personal violation.

But it’s not just the unfair censoring of social media. It’s the media itself, as illustrated by the virtual blackout of the Hunter Biden investigation by the left. It really is frightening.

A few days ago, I asked a friend of mine who is an ultra-Orthodox rabbi about his community’s voting patterns in recent years.

After explaining that they have largely voted Republican for some time now, he wrote: “I think that the support for Trump is more vocal because the two positions are so starkly contrasted - the left has lost any veneer of morality, their anti-Semitism is out in the open, their corruption is no longer questionable, they stand on the side of anarchy against law and order (which according to the Avot 3:2 [a citation from the Mishnah] and common sense is the primary function of a government) - and I think that the corruption of the media plays a big part in this - people are frightened of such an extremely corrupt media - in a certain sense the media is more powerful than government. A vote for Trump is a vote against the liberal media.”

Yes, “people are frightened of such an extremely corrupt media.” Are we that much better than oppressive regimes like North Korea, where the people are fed only what the government wants them to see and hear?

Here in America, we have an endless stream of news services from all perspectives, almost all of them available online in one form or another. But if the social media giants suppress the flow of that news according to their own biases, and if the media outlets we follow on the right or left are selective or even deceptive in what they report, then we will think we are getting the whole story when, in fact, we are not.

As for Glenn Greenwald, co-founder of the website Intercept, he resigned because his co-editors, all of them fiercely loyal to Joe Biden, would not allow his latest article to run. He explained, “The Intercept’s editors, in violation of my contractual right of editorial freedom, censored an article I wrote this week, refusing to publish it unless I remove all sections critical of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, the candidate vehemently supported by all New-York-based Intercept editors involved in this effort at suppression. The censored article, based on recently revealed emails and witness testimony, raised critical questions about Biden’s conduct.”

They would not even allow him to publish it elsewhere, and they also declined his invitation to write a rebuttal to his article, challenging his points. And so, he resigned.

As for Piers Moran, who seemed quite at home on CNN during his stint there, slammed the media’s failure to report on the Hunter Biden investigation, saying, “Imagine if we switched the names around. Imagine if the story was about Donald Trump Jr and Donald Trump. What would be happening?”

He added, “Do you think that the tech giants would be suppressing the story would the mainstream media be ignoring the story and say that it's all just an unfair smear on the Trumps?”

Yes, “The job of a newspaper, of a television network, of anybody, frankly, in the media, who believes in freedom of speech and believes in journalism is to go and investigate the allegations the New York Post has made.”

Not if it might hurt Joe Biden’s chances for election.

As for John Cleese, with reference to the creative process, he said, “I mean, if you’re going to come out with something really interesting artistically it’s going to come out of your unconscious, and if you’re having to edit everything you say before you say it then nothing it going to happen creatively — and also things that are rather lovely and funny in ordinary conversation, they’re not going to happen either, because everybody’s thinking ‘Ooh, somebody might [be offended]’.”

This, in turn ties in with the larger cancel culture, which is yet another, chilling aspect of censorship and silencing.

What, then, should we do?

Shout our messages from the rooftops. Speak out all the more loudly and clearly. Investigate and study and research. Get to the truth and share the truth.

As Paul wrote, “For we can do nothing against the truth, but only for the truth” (2 Corinthians 13:8).



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: censorship; facebook; hunterbiden; media; twitter

1 posted on 10/30/2020 12:48:27 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You can say that again. I hope.


2 posted on 10/30/2020 12:51:11 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Ministry of Truth calls it “content moderation” not “censorship.”


3 posted on 10/30/2020 12:51:46 PM PDT by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Our local NBC morning news team was talking about censorship this morning.

They said conservatives are complaining about too much censorship lately, while liberals are in favor of even more efforts to disallow “hate speech” being broadcast or shared (specifically related to social media).

This is what we are up against. As long as someone can call anything “hate speech”, we have no chance.


4 posted on 10/30/2020 12:54:09 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

You know who wasn’t concerned about it?

Think-tank Republicans who spent a decade delivering condescending lectures about how we could not dare to touch them as sacrosanct private companies.


5 posted on 10/30/2020 12:56:04 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

We have one chance.

Bust the Silicon Valley Trusts.

Don’t regulate them, don’t yell at them, don’t do studies about them, don’t hold hearings about them, don’t write articles about them.

Bust them into a thousand pieces!

And..Americans will have their freedom of speech back again...

The free market is not a suicide pact.


6 posted on 10/30/2020 12:58:08 PM PDT by cgbg (Biden n-2020: Criminal enterprise using cokehead as bagman. Pronounced: Bye Done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yes we should be concerned about censorship, but in the interim, the conservatives in this country can easily migrate over to Parler, which has a very similar platform and none of the censorship games played by the Twitler pukes.

Dorsey and fascist Twitler can FOAD.


7 posted on 10/30/2020 1:07:27 PM PDT by ScottinVA (First, letÂ’s deal with the election; then weÂ’ll deal with BLM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Speaking of Cleese, my wife is in this silly Facebook “meme” group. They tell mildly offensive jokes and such. A member got a 30 day FB ban for “hate speech”. She posted a quote from the Holy Grail where the French soldiers were taunting Arthur’s group from the top of the castle.

You don't frighten us, English pig-dogs! ---Go and boil your bottoms, sons of a silly person. I blow my nose at you, so-called Arthur-king, you and all your silly English knnnniggets.

THAT got her banned for “hate speech”.
8 posted on 10/30/2020 1:11:33 PM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

https://www.bitchute.com/video/vkmZoM6ojBn6/


9 posted on 10/30/2020 1:21:09 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

bookmark


10 posted on 10/30/2020 1:38:24 PM PDT by GOP Poet (Super cool you can change your tag line EVERYTIME you post!! :D. (Small things make me happy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Anti-trust laws need to be used to break up them. We can’t allow these giant internet moguls to have a monopoly on speech on the internet. When someone’s opposing view can be labeled hate speech and censored then the first amendment is meaningless. Yes, I realize they’re private entities but when they get so big as to control all speech on the internet they’re monopolies and the anti-trust laws were written for this type of situation.


11 posted on 10/30/2020 1:56:16 PM PDT by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ted Cruz’s grilling of Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has rightly gone viral. Yet the answers given by Dorsey were chilling. To paraphrase, ‘Even though we blew it, if the New York Post’ – yes, the Post, one of the nation’s leading and historic newspapers – ‘wants to access its account again, it must remove the tweet we don’t like.’


So even after admitting the policy in place was not right, and changing the policy, they still kept the NYPost’s account locked.

Yep. No issues there. Honest mistake. They’ve seen the light./s


12 posted on 10/30/2020 5:09:27 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A sudden interest in freedom., while bowing the knee to a virus designed to impose tyranny, um socialism, on America. They have most of the other countries, but a power hungry tyrant will never stop.


13 posted on 10/30/2020 5:45:19 PM PDT by momincombatboots (Ephesians 6... who you are really at war with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson