Twitter Suspends U.S. Border and Customs Chief For Celebrating Wall Protection From Illegal Aliens.

The Federalist ^ | 10/29/2020 | Tristan Justice

[mass55th]

"Starting to think twitter should be banned."

They are working with the Chi-Coms...all of them.

[CodeToad]

“Ain’t gonna happen with Pelosi ruling the House.”

It isn’t a House thing.

[SmokingJoe]

Keep telling yourself that.
Parler has grown faster from a standing start only recently than Twitter ever did.
All it would take is for Trump to move his account to Twitter with his over 80 million followers and Parler will be off like a rocket.
As it is Parler gas been growing fast anyways.
They are far better the Twitter.

[SmokingJoe]

Jack Dorsey Hires Homeless Man Off Streets Of San Francisco To Fill In For Him At Hearings
Babylon Bee ^ | 10/28/2020 | Babylon Bee

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3899462/posts

[MeneMeneTekelUpharsin]

Twitter needs to be shut down.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

It isn’t a House thing.

Tell me how you can change a law without a House vote.

[joshua c]

I am cheering Twitter on. They are fostering their own demise. Keep it up, Jack!

[libh8er]

Agree 100%. You can’t force your way into someone’s home and demand they treat you ‘fairly’. Maybe if Trump wins he will switch to Parler. Let’s see.

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Twitter briefly suspends CBP Commissioner Mark Morgan after he touts success of border wall: report

"Briefly?" Until after the election? Poor writing from Fox.

[EliRoom8]

>> There is a difference between the personal influence of a leader’s example, which may be rejected, and laws that compel obedience.<

A voice of reason. We can't just walk over and slap Jack Dorsey.

[CodeToad]

Revocation doesn’t require changing the law. You should read the law and understand it.

[Plain Old American]

The department of just us should sue them into compliance with the first amendment.

But dont hold your breath

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

Are you sure you don't mean "reinterpreting" or "clarifying" section 230? The FCC can do both but when you say Twitter needs their Section 230 protections removed you are suggesting a thought to which I am sympathetic, but I am not sure the FCC could win the resulting legal challenges. If they did I would be surprised.

[CodeToad]

Seriously, you need to read it. The FCC has nothing to do with this.

[rolling_stone]

past time for ICE to check twitter workers...

[gw-ington]

That’s true. Almost nobody is aware of the fact that you can’t permanently delete all your data on those social networks. You can try and it may seem as though all your data was deleted from those platforms, but those social networks permanently keep all your data (they own it), whether you know it or not.

[philetus]

Maybe Dorsey stays stoned all the time and has no idea about what’s happening at Twitter and his wife is running it.

[SteveH]

Celebration of the 400th Mile of Border Wall System

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uu2GC1pPv9s

[ETCM]

Keep telling yourself that.

Parler has grown faster from a standing start only recently than Twitter ever did.

All it would take is for Trump to move his account to Twitter with his over 80 million followers and Parler will be off like a rocket.

As it is Parler gas been growing fast anyways.

They are far better the Twitter.

Parler has had stagnant growth for over a month. With the election, they should be exploding right now. That said, there are two pretty big developments nobody is talking about.

1. Parler FINALLY listened to complaints and opened up a little. You can read (at least some) Parler content without signing up for an account and providing personal information. So, if someone post a link to a post on Parler, anyone can see it. But I don't see anyone posting Parler links...

2. Team Trump (Trump campaign) is on Parler, apparently with about 1.4 million followers. @TeamTrump on Parler

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

These are good points.
BTW - Your screen name just cracks me up.