The whole point was that the evidence against Flynn was NOT true and correct and the DOJ had an obligation by law to drop the charges. If they certify that it is true (i.e. Flynn did lie) then it makes them appear they are dropping a case for political reasons.
I don’t believe the DOJ has any obligation of this sort once they have dropped charges against someone. The evidence is moot and should be ignored by the trial judge at that point. A judge determines the truth of the evidence when presented by not when the prosecutor believes it does not show guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. What law school did Sullivan go to?
“What law school did Sullivan go to?”
Howard University Affirmative Action School of Law