Last sentence is critical before meltdown ensues...
“In her court filing, Boockvar had said that any such rejections pose “a grave risk of disenfranchisement on an arbitrary and wholly subjective basis,” and without any opportunity for a voter to verify their signature before their ballot is disqualified.”
So voter fraud is the price we pay to avoid disenfranchisement??????
that is a price too steep to pay because it DISENFRANCHISES ME BY DILUTING MY VOTE!!!!!!!!!!
Cute arguments are worth NOTHING
Bockvar is the democrat and she is saying there will be no way to get a hold of the ballot owner and check the signature so the ruling is that the signature does not matter and does not have to be matched or verified.
Why wouldn’t a republican meltdown over that? It is a bad ruling and only helps democrat voter fraud and it goes along with the USSC ruling that ballots can be counted up to 3 days after November 3rd and with no postmark
So No verified signatures, No postmarks and Ballots may be received after November 3rd for 3 Days Bad decisions aimed at hurting President Trump
They aren’t going to call 200,000 people with non-matching signatures. They are going to count the sham ballots, the vast majority of which will be Dem.
So if the signatures are flagged, is a voter expected to come and verify it in person so it can be counted???
This ruling makes little sense to me