Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: funfan

Bockvar is the democrat and she is saying there will be no way to get a hold of the ballot owner and check the signature

that is counter to what is quoted in the article.


32 posted on 10/23/2020 12:58:03 PM PDT by Flick Lives (My work's illegal, but at least it's honest. - Capt. Malcolm Reynolds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Flick Lives

Is it that is how I read it. Let me go back and re read.


44 posted on 10/23/2020 2:53:14 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Flick Lives

“County boards of elections are prohibited from rejecting absentee or mail-in ballots based on signature comparison conducted by county election officials or employees, or as the result of third-party challenges based on signature analysis and comparisons,” the justices wrote.

In her court filing, Boockvar had said that any such rejections pose “a grave risk of disenfranchisement on an arbitrary and wholly subjective basis,” and without any opportunity for a voter to verify their signature before their ballot is disqualified.

So the signature does not have to match now and can not be thrown out. I stand by what I said before I am not sure what I said that was wrong.


45 posted on 10/23/2020 3:04:12 PM PDT by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson